The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on illegal gambling.

No, they weren't personally in attendance, however the world-famous celebs were notably included in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes casinos - the questionable websites using both free casino-style games and rewarding rewards, such as cash, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can 'play for free,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The websites are simply 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar industry that now finds itself besieged by claims. In the eyes of many gaming corporations, not to mention claim complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos serve as standard casinos, just without the oversight, customer securities and tax laws. So not just can they prevent the steep 24-percent federal gambling levy, but sweepstakes operators aren't based on regulatory hurdles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming defenses.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in income last year alone. Now the business deals with accusations of illegal gambling in a New york city claim that claims VGW uses celeb endorsers to 'create a veneer of legitimacy' around its item. (See VGW's statement below)

'I'm uncertain" if you do not trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton" is a winning message for companies running multibillion-dollar prohibited operations out of locations like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's presenter, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, informed DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers include a variety of celebs from gambling lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, in addition to NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom use any distinctions between standard sports betting and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among numerous sweepstakes casinos discovered online

Ryan Seacrest advises fans to play at Chumba Casino, where lots of - however not all - games are complimentary

Drake has an offer with social sweeps casino, Stake, that he regularly promotes on social networks

Find out more

Donald Trump 'set to name NBA group owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, ads generally center around the social element of the gambling establishments, while leaving out the potential for real sports betting losses.

Others tempt consumers with promises of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks ad flaunting Drake's automobiles, planes and estates before pivoting to footage of the rapper playing online casino-style games.

'Daddy, why do we have so much money?' read the very first caption on the screen.

Another caption explained: 'Because I never gave up.'

The disparity in between gambling sites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit complicated, however operators of the latter insist they're not involved with the former.

A representative for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), described its members are not in direct competition with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA information, the majority of the gamers on social-sweepstakes gambling establishments are playing for totally free.

'Most social sweeps clients never purchase,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of clients who make purchases do so in amounts far smaller sized than the common deposit or bet size at real-money online gaming sites.'

Social casinos use customers a possibility to play casino-style video games with good friends. Players have the alternative to purchase worthless currency typically referred to as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine cash, but can be used to open numerous functions within the video games.

But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes video gaming, enabling clients to acquire other currency understood as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for cash or other prizes.

And therein lies the potential for monetary losses, like the ones claimed by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One gamer told the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the past year after continuing to buy more coins in pursuit of cash and other things of value.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Global Poker event

Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an ad displaying Drake's automobiles, airplanes and estates

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online casinos are prohibited in all however seven states, which has actually helped to fuel the popularity of sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which don't require usually require identification. However, sites like Chumba will request for IDs from gamers trying to withdraw any funds.

Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, enable clients to submit mail-in requests for complimentary sweeps coins, provided the gamers follow painfully particular instructions. What's more, gamers are often rewarded with sweeps coins simply for signing up, thereby providing a factor to attempt their hands at any variety of casino video games for a possibility to win - or lose - real money.

So why are sweepstakes sites allowed to run in 48 states, while online casinos are prohibited in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their product is the totally free casino-style gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is merely a method of promoting their bread and butter.

'Social sweepstakes games are simply a kind of online home entertainment,' an SPGA representative told DailyMail.com by email. 'No purchase is required to play at social casinos with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never have to pay for an opportunity to win prizes. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" factor to consider" - is a crucial difference in between social sweeps and standard online gambling sites like casinos.'

Think about the manner in which McDonald's utilizes its yearly Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to gamble, but rather they're buying hamburgers and french fries that use them the possibility to win financially rewarding rewards, such as a $1 million prize.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'factor to consider', the video game itself doesn't fulfill the definition of gambling in the US.

'Sweepstakes are a long-standing method for promoting all kinds of daily organizations in the United States, whatever from burgers to magazine memberships to coffee and home enhancement shops,' the SPGA representative told DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promos are frequently used by a who's who of family names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to many gambling market insiders, that argument doesn't cut it.

For starters, gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach explains, McDonald's Monopoly video game doesn't run forever. Rather, it has a distinct start and end, thereby recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's main item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being utilized to promote real products like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They don't last forever and they're usually not connected to casino-style games of opportunity,' Wallach informed DailyMail.com. 'They're just money giveaways.

'The sweepstakes [gambling establishments] have none of the qualities commonly connected with McDonald's-style sweepstakes promotions,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in eternity, the sweepstakes gambling establishments provide" casino-like" payments, generally 80 percent or more of incomes, whereas the normal payout percentage for a short-term promotional sweepstakes is a minor share of the earnings earned by the business [typically less than one percent]'

Wallach is quick to liken the online social sweeps casinos to the web coffee shops that sprang up in Florida, offering clients the opportunity to play casino-style games for genuine prizes. Much of those brick-and-mortar establishments have actually because been shuttered over claims of illegal sports betting.

DJ Khaled is among several celebrity spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand name

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps casinos should deal with similar scrutiny.

'These differences are not arbitrary,' Wallach stated of social sweeps casinos. 'They have repeatedly been cited by courts and state chief law officer as crucial factors in identifying that a sweepstakes promotion was in reality a guise for unlawful gaming.'

Among the casino market's leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing legislators to examine sweepstakes operators and, in some cases, enact new legislation on the problem.

'Consumers are being denied of protections and states are passing up significant tax and profits chances as this gambling changes that performed through regulated channels,' checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.

And then there are the complainants who have actually taken legal action against social gambling establishments in more than a lots states.

Sweepstakes gambling establishment operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four separate cases in Kentucky without confessing any misbehavior, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW consented to pay $11.75 million in one class-action suit, stating the settlement was made to avoid legal expenses and continued litigation.

Michael Phelps has actually signed a deal with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the current claim, which is mainly comparable to its predecessors, New york city state residents Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both claim to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is explained in the filing as an 'unlawful gaming business. '

Apple and Google have likewise been named as defendants in claims for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech company responded to DailyMail.com's ask for comment.

'We typically don't talk about matters before the courts,' a VGW representative informed DailyMail.com by means of email. 'However, we keep in mind that this claim has actually only simply been filed with the court and VGW has not been formally served.

'We have complete self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and guidelines where we run, and remain positive about the future,' the spokesperson continued. 'We continue to use our free-to-play games throughout many of North America, as we have for more than a years, creating not only excellent video games, user experiences and home entertainment, however likewise guaranteeing this is done securely, responsibly and at the greatest level of requirements.

'More broadly, we 'd reiterate that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are relatively typical across the online social games industry (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we mean to vigorously safeguard any claim which may be brought against us.'

The issues between standard online gambling and sweepstakes gambling establishments could show bothersome for some star endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both endorse VGW's Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with conventional video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's ironic that professional athletes are hawking illegal sports betting 'sweeps' websites while at the very same time the leagues wish to forecast a strong position versus prohibited gaming - specifically when attempting to tamp down the periodic sports betting scandal,' Glaser informed DailyMail.com.

It was just 8 months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a life time restriction from the NBA over allegations he conspired with bettors. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unrelated to anything including social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Together with VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting allegedly prohibited gambling sites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes gambling establishments as a major problem for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd expect that a league crackdown on athletes endorsing sweepstakes sites is a matter of when, not if,' Glaser included.

Neither an NBA spokesperson nor the gamers' representatives reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps also ignored to react to DailyMail.com emails.

Asked if their celeb endorsers have a duty to describe to clients the distinctions and resemblances in between iGaming and sweepstakes casinos, VGW insisted there is absolutely nothing more that requires to be done.

'We have complete confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial collaborations, and our organization practices more broadly,' the spokesperson stated. 'A few of our worths are" our players come initially" and" we do what's right", and we put our values at the core of whatever we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes websites, sees things in a different way.

'Celebrities who provide their names to shady unlawful sports betting websites are, at a minimum, putting their credibilities at risk in addition to courting civil and class actions by customers who declare harm,' Glaser said. 'There is also some risk that state regulators and state lawyers basic rope star endorsers into enforcement efforts for assisting in illegal gaming.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton